Project Title:

 

Scrutinizing the impact of CCS communication on the general and local public 

 

Download here the: Final Report 

 

 

Project Αbstract: The public acceptance of CCS is an important precondition for the large-scale deployment of these technologies. At present it can be assumed that the majority of the public is neither for nor against CCS, because the level of awareness among the public is very low or virtually nonexistent. Hence, the pivotal question is how information on CCS has to be communicated in order to increase the stability and consistency of public opinion to better predict future public support or opposition.The main assumption of the project “Impact of communication” is that communication on CCS should enable the public to develop their own well-considered opinion on the technologies. Otherwise the strength with which the opinions on CCS are held will be very low and therefore these opinions will be very unstable. If public attitudes are very unstable they are worthless for predicting future support for CCS.Therefore, the aim of the project is to develop recommendations for the communication of CCS enabling the public to establish their own informed opinion. For this purpose the project will carry out a comparative study of the communication of CCS in six European countries: Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania and the United Kingdom.The comparative approach is based on two main methods which will be applied in all countries: a) a survey of a representative sample of citizens to investigate the awareness, knowledge and opinions of the public concerning climate change, energy technologies and CCS, b) a study that compares the effectiveness of two different methods for communicating CCS (focus groups and Information-Choice Questionnaire) which both aim to enable lay persons to develop their own well-considered opinions. The collected data will be compared to enable conclusions to be drawn concerning the question of how to communicate information on CCS technologies so that the resulting public opinions are stable and consistent hence are of high quality.

 

 

List of Partners

 

NoPartner nameOrganisation websiteCountry
1Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy Research, Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEF-STE) - Coordinatorhttp://www.fz-juelich.de Germany
2Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energyhttp://www.wupperinst.org Germany
3Centre for Research and Technology Hellas/Institute for Solid Fuels Technology and Application(CERTH/ISFTA)

http://www.lignite.gr/

http://www.certh.gr/

Greece
4University of Macedonia, Economic and Social Sciences Department of Applied Informaticshttp://www.uom.gr/ Greece
5Leiden Universityhttp://www.leidenuniv.nl/ The Netherlands
6Stiftelsen SINTEFhttp://www.sintef.no Norway
7Natural Environment Research Council (British Geological Survey)

www.nerc.ac.uk

www.bgs.ac.uk

UK
8University of Cambridgewww.cam.ac.uk UK
9National Institute of Marine Geology and Geoecologywww.geoecomar.ro Romania
10Institute for Studies and Power Engineeringwww.ispe.ro Romania
11National School of Political Studies and Public Administrationwww.snspa.ro Romania

 

 

For more information please visit the webpage of the project ( http://www.ccs-communications.gr)

or contact the Project coordinator:

Dr. Diana Schumann (d.schumann@fz-juelich.de),

Phone number: +49 2461 61 3588

Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

Institute of Energy Research, Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEF-STE)

Germany


FENCO-NET
1st Call
evaluation
finalised



FENCO-NET
4th Meeting
Oslo 21.-22.02.13